August is Europe's annual organisational audit.

Not the official audit. The useful one.

The out-of-office replies begin. Meetings become easier to schedule because nobody is available. Corridors go quiet. The canteen closes one counter and somehow improves the service.

Then a normal request arrives.

That is when the organisation discovers that the process is not a process.

It is Anna.

Anna is currently near a lake

Anna knows which form is really required, which supplier answers quickly, which approval can run in parallel and why the official folder contains three versions marked FINAL.

None of this is in her job description.

It is also not in the procedure, because the procedure was written before the software changed and after the person who understood the exception retired.

Normally, nobody notices. Anna connects the pieces. She replies to the message, repairs the spreadsheet and calls the one person who can unlock the order.

In August, Anna is near a lake and has made the radical decision not to check her phone.

The system stops.

This is not Anna's failure

Organisations often react by blaming key people for failing to document everything they know.

That is convenient.

Anna did not choose to become the undocumented interface between finance, procurement, operations and a supplier portal designed by somebody who disliked humanity. She became essential because every gap was easier to route through a reliable person than to repair properly.

Her competence hid the weakness.

That is what capable people do. They make a bad system look acceptable until they take leave, change jobs or finally stop answering “quick questions” at 21:30.

The August questions

When work slows because somebody is away, do not immediately create a backup mailbox and declare resilience achieved.

Ask:

  • Which decision can only one person make?
  • Which information exists only in someone's memory?
  • Which password, contact or workaround has become infrastructure?
  • Which task has a nominal backup who has never performed it?
  • Which process works only because one person is willing to be interrupted?

The answers are usually more valuable than the annual continuity exercise.

They show the real organisation, not the one in the diagram.

Let people disappear properly

A healthy organisation allows people to go on leave without becoming remote life-support machines.

That does not require documenting every breath. It requires clear ownership, usable records, trained substitutes and fewer processes built around private heroics.

It also requires management to tolerate small delays while backups learn. If every temporary dip is solved by calling Anna at the lake, no backup will ever become real.

August will pass. The meetings will return. The office will refill and somebody will again write “gentle reminder” in an email that feels neither gentle nor necessary.

Before that happens, notice what the quiet revealed.

Your process may be a person.

Please let her finish her holiday.

Image credit

Hero photograph: an empty office by Brian Wangenheim / Unsplash. Cropped for web display.

Original photograph →
Pressure changes shape. The work remains.

Reader discussion

Join the discussion

Comments are moderated. Disagreement and strong opinions are welcome. Spam, threats and personal abuse are not.